Pages

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

NY Times OK With Criminal Mercantilsm Against Bolivian Coca

Disgraceful editorial rubber stamp approval of cigarette racketeering against infinitely safer Coca

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/opinion/07tue3.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin

We understand why the Bush administration and Congress are fed up with Bolivia’s president, Evo Morales. Bolivia has become markedly less cooperative with American counternarcotics efforts, as evidenced by a large increase in coca cultivation. [earth to the New York Times: Coca is not a 'narcotic', but the deceived are certainly dopes- particularly with the criminal mercantilism for protecting the market in adulterated misbranded cigarettes] And Mr. Morales regularly stokes anti-Yankee sentiment to undercut his opposition and divert attention from his government’s poor performance. Last month, Mr. Morales expelled the American ambassador, Philip Goldberg. [Why not instead arrest Mr. Goldberg for working for criminal mercantilsim against Coca and for subverting the health of Bolivians with adulterated, misbranded US cigarettes?]

Congress was so annoyed that when it voted to extend Andean trade preferences last week, it limited tariff-free benefits for Bolivia and Ecuador (which is expelling the American military from the airbase in the coastal city of Manta) to six months, with the possibility of a six-month extension. The White House, meanwhile, is proposing to suspend Bolivia’s trade benefits altogether. That is self-defeating. It would undermine the anti-drug strategy — which seeks to wean poor farmers from the coca trade by opening the American market to other products — and play right into Mr. Morales’s hands.

Mr. Morales doesn’t tire of saying Bolivia will neither “retreat nor submit” to Washington’s will, and he has been talking up relations with Iran and Venezuela. After Bolivia was classified as uncooperative with American anti-drug efforts last month, the government in La Paz said it would seek help — and military helicopters — from Russia instead. Last week, it rejected an American request to fly an anti-drug plane over Bolivian territory.

Generally, it’s a bad idea to tie foreign aid programs that are in the American interest to the behavior of foreign governments. “Decertifying” unhelpful countries in the drug wars always seemed particularly wrongheaded, a surefire way to anger allies and undermine support for Washington’s objectives in Latin America.

The Bush administration seemed to understand this logic. When it blacklisted Bolivia last month, it also waived potential sanctions against the country. Unfortunately, the justified anger at the expulsion of Mr. Goldberg seems to be clouding that judgment. The administration should reconsider.




3 comments:

srunequester said...

Arrest Mr. Goldberg? It is probably because of a little thing called diplomatic immunity. Expulsion is the only option, I think. That, and establishing relations with Russia, Iran, and Venezuela, as they are doing.

Douglas A. Willinger said...

Yet are Russia, Iran or Venezuela any better- have they re-legalized Coca products?

srunequester said...

Better? No, it is a matter of playing various powers against each other. The world is like a chessboard at times.