Pages

Saturday, June 25, 2011

Ron Paul & Barney Frank's Bill Curtailing Federal MJ Prohibition

New proposed legislation, reportedly authored by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, would curtail the federal government's role in marijuana enforcement, limiting it to cross-border or interstate smuggling, though continuing to allow states to maintain prohibition under an ancient regime preference for the 10th amendment as opposed to the 9th Amendment.

This proposed law, H.R. 2306 initial co-sponsors include Reps. John Conyers, D-Mich.; Steve Cohen, D-Tenn.; Jared Polis, D-Colo.; and Barbara Lee, D-Oakland.
H. R. 2306 A BILL

To limit the application of Federal laws to the distribution and consumption of marihuana, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2011″

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT TO MARIHUANA.

Part A of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

SEC. 103. APPLICATION OF THIS ACT TO MARIHUANA.

a.PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN SHIPPING OR TRANSPORTATION.

-This Act shall not apply to marihuana, except that it shall be unlawful only to ship or transport, in any manner or by any means whatsoever, marihuana, from one State, Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof, into any other State, Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof, or from any foreign country into any State, Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof, when such marihuana is intended, by any person interested therein, to be received, possessed, sold, or in any manner used, either in the original package or otherwise, in violation of any law of such State, Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

b.PENALTY. -Whoever knowingly violates sub-section (a) shall be fined under title 18, United States 26 Code, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

SEC. 3. DEREGULATION OF MARIHUANA.

a.REMOVED FROM SCHEDULE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES. -Schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812(c)) is amended—

1.by striking “marihuana”; and
2.by striking “tetrahydrocannabinols”.

b.REMOVAL OF PROHIBITION ON IMPORT AND EXPORT. -Section 1010 of the Controlled Substances Importand Export Act (21 U.S.C. 960) is amended—

1.by striking subparagraph (G) of subsection(b)(1);
2.by striking subparagraph (G) of subsection(b)(2); and
3.by striking paragraph (4) of subsection (b).

SEC. 4. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.

a.Section 102(44) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(44)) is amended by striking “marihuana”.
b.Part D of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841 et seq.) is amended as follows:
1.In section 401—
A.by striking subsection (b)(1)(A)(vii);
B.by striking subsection (b)(1)(B)(vii);
C.by striking subsection (b)(1)(D); and
D.by striking subsection (b)(4).
2.In section 402(c)(2)(B), by striking “marihuana”
3.In section 403(d)(1), by striking “marihuana”
4.In section 418(a), by striking the last sentence
5.In section 419(a), by striking the last sentence
6.In section 422(d), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “marijuana”.
7.In section 422(d)(5), by striking “, such as a marihuana cigarette,”

SEC. 5. CONSTRUCTION.

No provision of this Act shall be construed to affect Federal drug testing policies, and each Federal agency shall conduct a review of its drug testing policies not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act to ensure that the language of any such policy is in accordance with this section.

As reported here, H.R. 2306 is now being blocked by Rep. Lamar Smith (R) Texas, who ironically was endorsed by H.R. 2306 co-sponsor Ron Paul.



Direct Link:
http://youtu.be/KmJqSLNy8ms

Ron Paul in italics

I just want a quick statement on why you are encouraging your supporters to support Lamar Smith, 22 year incumbent, 2 time bailout voter, voted for the war in Iraq; we are curious down here in Austin.

I have made an agreement that I will support the incumbents of Texas- Republican incumbents of Texas.
I am in the Republican Party.
I am the most independent Republican within Congress.
But there’s a limit to how much independence one can get away with within Washington, D.C.

Make of it what you will on the dynamics here, leading up to this, and that to follow.

6 comments:

avles said...

New chairman of Trieste council Iztok Furlanic openly exhibited to have smoked "light substances" (Marijuana etc.).

He was immeditately aftr the appointment blamed for that, together for other reasons

--------------------
".......Q: They have recalled that you don't want in public places the crucifix, that you dressed up like a cowboy in the council now presided by you, that you played the piano to vote in turn of Racovelli, to have let to be shot with a Tito's partisan hat of IX corpus, exalting on Facebook the slogan "Trst je nas!", and also admitted to have smoked light substances, which don't hurt so much..... Did you expect such a burst?......."
http://adrgegenreformationheute.blogspot.com/2011/06/comedy-last-terminaltor-becomes-reality.html
--------------------

avles said...

Probably a living Titanic in order to make it sink against the icebergs of that "little politic", and to kill, among 1,000 wrong things he is supporting, those three "Guggenheim, Strauss, Astor" (exhumation of the allegedly buried in Fojba di Basovizza, resistance against the Romish-Masonic transverse Mafia, and resistance against PHARMACRATIC INQUISITION)...

(Im quoting you: ".....You ask why politics are so screwed up while continually voting for the lesser of two evils; yet you fail to fathom the quite obvious dynamics of etc. etc......"
)

avles said...

Tourists to be banned from Amsterdam cannabis cafes

From: news.com.au
May 30, 2011 10:55AM
84 comments

Dutch to ban tourists from cannabis cafes
Only locals will be able to buy the drug
Move could cost the country millions of dollars
What Qantas hosties hate about passengers
In pictures: Best travel deals

FOREIGNERS will be banned from Holland's infamous cannabis-selling coffee shops under new anti-drug laws.

Under the new rules only Dutch residents will be allowed to enter the shops, which lawfully sell small amounts of cannabis to customers, the Daily Mail reported.

By the end of the year customers will have to sign up for a one-year membership, or "dope pass", to the shops.

.............

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/travel/news/tourists-to-be-banned-from-amsterdam-cannabis-cafes/story-e6frfq80-1226065506430#ixzz1QZC9arn9



Read more: http://www.news.com.au/travel/news/tourists-to-be-banned-from-amsterdam-cannabis-cafes/story-e6frfq80-1226065506430#ixzz1QZBxGtT2

avles said...

Next step: close commercial sex.

Douglas A. Willinger said...

"Dope" pass- should refer to virginia bright leaf contempt for humanity and anyone supporting such illegal and immoral "laws"

avles said...

After "drug" there's "sex" (for rock'n roll i'll try to do something in the future.... just look at the romantic and RC work of Wagner "parsifal"....):

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

"The first human being born without sin"

http://sexandthevatican.blogspot.com/2011/06/first-human-being-born-without-sin.html